In this post, the author indicates that she seems to be enjoying (and preferring) dating women much more dating men. I find this very interesting. She's not talking about being a man-hating dyke. She's simply talking about hanging out, having fun and (dare she say it) flirting with women. She further adds that dating women perfectly satisfies her childhood idealist fantasy of what a date is supposed to be.
She says that the women she get's to meet and date (yes.. they actually do call back after they promise to) are smart, strong, gorgeous women. They have ambition, common sense and unbelievable flair. After that statement, the bomb is dropped. I could almost hear the collective gasp of all male netizens as they held their already bated breath and read that it is impossible to find men who have even a fraction of the qualities these women possess. Do they even exists?
I find this very scary. Does this mean that we're being outcompeted and outdone by women on all fronts? Has it become so extreme that another woman can even snatch away my woman?
I realize that half of the contributors to this blog are very successful, highly respected, well accomplished, independent women. This makes me even more curious and I have to pose the question:
My dear women... are you ladies so independent because they're no men who meet the high standards that the modern women has set?
If this is indeed the case then the man is soon to be a dinosaur. In a previous post I indicated as much. In this brave new world where a man can be replaced by a $15 toy and a few girlfriends (not necessarily to be employed at the same time..lol), we are facing some serious competition.
Then there's the added challenge that Men are disadvantaged. We are at a serious disadvantage when we have to go toe to toe with a woman for the same job because of 2 reasons compounded by an evil case of positive feedback:
- Affirmative action. Women have been marginalized in recent times so now we(men) are under pressure to hire women.
- P&$@y power. The prospective employer is faced with a tough choice. Does he employ this sexy creature who speaks with a voice that can charm the sun out of heaven. This woman who looks likely she was just pulled out of a playboy centerfold or a Maybelline advertisement. This woman who's very appearance is a promise of (at the very least) endless pleasurable fantasizing as you call her to schedule yet another meeting and discuss the vicissitudes and vagaries associated with human resource management and ensuring employee morale.
Or perhaps he should hire this barrel chested, pot belly having, hairy armed, sweaty wannabe corporate executive who is only interested in doing his job?
(Now before I get shot, let me qualify one thing: Women in the corporate space are not sluts... they simply have a lot of (what's the word) sexual leverage. And we all know that sex sells.
All this is exercebated by positive feedback. As the number of women being employed by male corporate executives explodes, women are suddenly the only employees who can be promoted (because we're in a predominantly oestrogen filled workplace). These women who are now the CEOs, CTOs, CFOs, C-All-Os are not likely to hire the men who they fought so hard to progress ahead of in the first place. So instantly we find ourselves in an Amazonian jungle, where "men" is a word that evokes distant memories of an ancient civilization predating the Aztechs.
Oh.. I can hear the questions:
"How will the human race procreate?.. we'll all be doomed in your grim dark world view"
Well.. I'm sorry to be the one to break this to you but a female scientist is about to find a way to reproduce humans without men.
Comments